SIDEBAR
»
S
I
D
E
B
A
R
«
What the hell is Trump doing???????????????????? – Part 2…this week.
Apr 22nd, 2020 by Rob Smith, Jr.

What the hell is Trump doing????????????????????

About this immigration move by Trump.
What he’s really doing.
Liberals should cheer.

Cartoon to come.

This Charlie Kirk post got me Flagged on Facebook. Here is why they were wrong to do it…
Apr 16th, 2020 by Rob Smith, Jr.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHahahaha!
First time THAT has happened!

“Partly False” with ZERO reference.
WORSE it’s by “Politifact”.
I happen to know a TON about “Politifact”.
It’s owned by the Poynter Institute.
That’s named after Nelson Poynter.
Most have no idea who Poynter was or what that the goal of the Institute is to maintain his views.
I’ve been to the Institute and asked questions.
Their goal is to uphold Poynter’s views.
What were Poynter’s views?
Communism.
THAT’s why “politifact” ONLY reviews whatever they want at certain angles.

I can review – 1+1=2 – and prove it to be true, mostly true, false, etc.
That’s what the Poynter Institute does.
Skew other’s views to meet Poynter’s views.
If you read their logic to their grades, it’s easy to see that often the logic is faulty. The goal is to emulate Poynter.

So, what’s “Partly False” in the Charlie Kirk graphic?
I can answer one error. Today it was announced that the number unemployed is now at 22,000,000.

But wait! I had to really dig to find just what “politifact’ has a problem with this . That’s in the next comment.

Here’s “politFact’s problem with the above. It would have been responsible of Facebook to have their bots attach reasons.
Facebook employees should also review these. If they had, they would not be flagging this graphic all over Facebook…Unless the intent was political.

First, there is no post I find from them involving Charlie Kirk specifically. This involves some other graphic with a different image, but same information.

Interesting that the post above is tagged, “Partly False”. Whereas, “Politifact”‘s post marks it “Mostly False”. There are grammaical errors in the above graphic – That would also mark it “partly False”. Considering the review, this would fit.

Here’s the review by “politifact”:

https://www.politifact.com/…/facebook-post…/

The article (Which i will mark “Mostly False”), tees off with a very clear political intent:

“It didn’t take long after the enactment of a $2.2 trillion coronavirus relief bill for critics to blame Democrats for larding it with unnecessary spending.”

The intent of this is clear: How dare anyone critique Government actions. How very Poynter of them.

“politifact” admits most all is true. They get into cheap semantics about PBS, which any decent journalist would find sickening. They state the intent stated of “$25 million went to congressional salaries and expenses.” is to fund issues involving the “virus 19” hysteria within congress. Thing is, the cash is still going to “salaries and expenses”, paying those to achieve certain goals involving “virus 19”. So, technically, it ain’t wrong.

There’s also quibbling about the money for refugee relocation, but , if you know how the office operates, that will be the end result.

Their real problem is what in the graphic they don’t show on their site and not part of the Charlie Kirk graphic:
“The implication that laid-off workers get no assistance”
Supposedly the graphic they are reviewing states something along those lines. Who knows? For some insane reason they provide no empirical evidence the graphic exists.

Be that as it is, if that is what is written, I agree, that is false. Thing is, that the wording is not part of the Charlie Kirk graphic.

Technically, the Kirk graphic is True. At worse, mostly all true, due to the change of those unemployed…which is not addressed at all.

Whoa! Whoa!
I found the graphic!!!
“poltifact” states:

“The implication that laid-off workers get no assistance”

That is No Where in the graphic!”
22,000,000 lost jobs is a Fact.
That wasteful bill was passed is a Fact.
They admit the information is True, with silly semantic quibbles.
The graphic is True.
“politifact” is False!

To bad those at Facebook haven’t recognized they have a bad source yet.

Bogus “Virus 19” Numbers…
Apr 15th, 2020 by Rob Smith, Jr.

The number never shown is how many are sick? Recovery from what?

Since the medical industry states anyone sick with anything – who then is tested and found with “virus 19” is added, then what on earth does that “Recovery” number mean?

All we are told is 10 to 20% of “Cases” get sick. Most of those have nothing more than a mild cold. Tom Hanks didn’t even get that much. Prince Charles got nothing.

The virus does go away. For all I know I may have had and now it’s gone. Yet no follow-up is done and so the numbers you see HAVE to go up.

Bottom line is: All of these numbers are bogus.

We’ll never know how many have whatever other viruses out there now. We never knew how many had Swine Flu. It’s thought that also spread over most.

It’s this one we’ve let the Media and Government make us crazy about and costing lives outside the virus.

As long as this list is ONLY to collect each report of those who have been diagnosed with “virus 19”, it’s like a guy hoarding comic books and won’t ever give them up. So he keeps collecting and collecting and collecting…
The numbers can’t go down.

Why is there not a similar tally now of how much money is being lost by the second of Government, Businesses and Citizens?
THAT would truly terrify people and we would stop this nonsense right now.

Apr 10th, 2020 by Rob Smith, Jr.

»  Substance:WordPress   »  Style:Ahren Ahimsa
© Copyright 2008-2014, Rob Smith, Jr.